by mguhlin

MyNotes - A Plan for Effective Discussion Boards

EdTech

In reading Rob Kelly’s “A Plan for Effective Discussion Boards” appearing in Synchronous and Asynchronous Learning Tools: 15 Strategies for Engaging Online Students Using Real-Time Chat, Threaded Discussions, and Blogs at www.facultyfocus.com, I found the following helpful:

Types of questions to ask…Six Socratic questioning techniques as delineated by Richard Paul to get students involved in discussions that go beyond simply opinion:

Conceptual Clarification Questions

Questions that get students to think about concepts behind their arguments:

  • Why are you saying that?
  • What exactly does this mean?
  • How does this relate to what we have been talking about?
  • Can you give me an example?

Probing Assumptions - questions that get students to think about the beliefs that they base their arguments on.

  • What else could we assume?
  • How did you choose those assumptions?
  • How can you verify or disprove that assumption?
  • What would happen if…?

Probing rationale, reasons, and evidence - questions that get students to think about the support for their arguments.

  • Why is that happening?
  • How do you know this?
  • Can you give me an example?
  • What do you think causes…?
  • On what authority are you basing your argument?

Questioning Viewpoints and Perspectives - questions that get students to consider other viewpoints.

  • What are some alternate ways of looking at this?
  • Who benefits from this?
  • How are x and y similar?

Probe Implications and Consequences - questions that get students to think about the what follows from their arguments.

  • Then what would happen?
  • What are the consequences of that assumption?

Questions about the Question - questions that turn the question in on itself.

  • What was the point of asking that question?
  • Why do you think I asked this question?

Subscribe to Around the Corner-MGuhlin.org


Everything posted on Miguel Guhlin’s blogs/wikis are his personal opinion and do not necessarily represent the views of his employer(s) or its clients. Read Full Disclosure